Imagine Wireless CLE · Rev 1 Baseline
Venue Network Intelligence Report · Deep Edition · Rev 1

Network baseline for Cleveland Hopkins International Airport ahead of a neutral-host decision

The reconciled DAS master records no distributed antenna system (DAS), no self-owned system, and no neutral host at CLE Imagine knowledge graph. A 2024 neutral-host DAS solicitation exists; no award appears in the record we hold. This report measures where each carrier stands at the gates, by zone, by band, and by serving cell, so a design and an acceptance plan can start from a documented baseline.

49
Gates measured · every gate-carrier pair n ≥ 30 tiles
25,152
On-airport RF tiles · of 168,206 exported · 14,065 usage tiles
82
Mapped venue points · Google Places + OpenStreetMap capture · pinned 2026-09-08
0 / 147
Gate-carrier pairs below the critical line (−110 dBm)
Prepared by the Imagine Wireless Network Intelligence Platform · Powered by Ookla
Data window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31 · Issued 2026-09-08 (rev 1) · Freshness 39 days at issue
Prepared for City of Cleveland Department of Port Control stakeholder review
Confidential
Section 1

Overview

Executive readout

Verizon leads Concourses A and B and the venue gate median. T-Mobile leads Concourse C on the tile basis; the Main Terminal is split between T-Mobile's stronger median and Verizon's higher healthy share. AT&T sits below the healthy line at 39 of 49 gates. No gate is critical for any carrier: 0 of 147 gate-carrier pairs measure below −110 dBm.

−86.1 dBm
Verizon gate median 5G RSRP · healthy at 49 of 49 gates
−89.1 dBm
T-Mobile gate median 5G RSRP · healthy at 49 of 49 gates
−96.3 dBm
AT&T gate median 5G RSRP · healthy at 10 of 49 gates · at risk at 39
Verizon

Strongest at the gates on the venue median and the LTE network of record. Median 5G reference signal received power (RSRP) of −86.1 dBm, healthy at 49 of 49 gates, best 5G NR at 34 of 49 gates, and best LTE at 46 of 49. Median signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) is +16.4 dB, healthy at 49 of 49 gates. Verizon holds best 5G NR at all 13 Concourse A gates and all 11 Concourse B gates.

T-Mobile

Healthy at 49 of 49 gates with a gate median of −89.1 dBm, 3.0 dB behind Verizon. T-Mobile holds best 5G NR at 15 of the 25 Concourse C gates, leads Concourse C on the tile basis, and holds the stronger Main Terminal median while Verizon holds the higher healthy share there (section 6). Its 5G footprint is the widest of the three carriers at 87% of its tiles. Its LTE median at the gates is −97.4 dBm, healthy at 6 of 49 gates.

AT&T

The load-bearing finding of this report. Gate median −96.3 dBm, 1.3 dB below the −95 dBm healthy line; healthy at 10 of 49 gates, at risk at 39, critical at 0. AT&T is the weakest carrier at 47 of the 49 asymmetry gates and the weak carrier at all 39 one-carrier-weak gates (section 5). A 5G reading appears on 36% of its tiles; the other 64% carry LTE only, with an LTE median of −96.8 dBm at the gates. A hosted AT&T path is the largest measurable lift a neutral-host system could deliver at CLE.

How to read the margins

The Verizon-to-T-Mobile gate-median margin is 3.0 dB, and both carriers are healthy at every gate. The material gap is to AT&T: 7.2 dB from T-Mobile and 10.2 dB from Verizon on the gate median. Margins under 1 dB are reported as ties, never as rankings. Zone-level results use the tile basis and differ from the gate ranking in Concourse C and the Main Terminal.

What this report measures

Every result is signal-layer: RSRP and SINR from an Android crowdsource panel, aggregated per tile over the 12-month window. The export contains no throughput, latency, or session counts, so it shows where signal is, not whether a call or an app fails. A strong-signal network can still be congested. Section 13 states the thresholds and caveats.

Section 2

Venue and procurement context

Asset inventory · solicitation record

CLE is owned and operated by the City of Cleveland through its Department of Port Control. The record we hold describes a medium hub with no in-building cellular system and a 2024 neutral-host solicitation whose current status this report does not hold. Measured facts in this report stand on the tile export alone; the knowledge graph (KG) record may corroborate them and never originates them.

ElementValueNotes
AirportCleveland Hopkins International (CLE / KCLE)City of Cleveland, Department of Port Control · medium hub · 4,855,943 calendar-year enplanements Imagine knowledge graph
Traffic10,003,833 passengers in 2025, down 1.7%Per the Imagine knowledge graph
Tile basis25,152 on-airport RF tiles · 14,065 usage tilesClipped to the KCLE aerodrome polygon plus 200 m from 168,206 exported · window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31
Gate basis49 gates · 147 gate-carrier pairsPinned OpenStreetMap (OSM) inventory: A 13, B 11, C 25. The airport guide lists A 12 and C 23; reconcile against the current gate plan before adopting gate-named criteria
ConcoursesA Frontier · B Delta and Southwest · C United, American, JetBlue, Air Canada · D closedAirline mapping transcribed from public terminal guides (Tier B). Concourse D is closed to passenger service and excluded
Tenant basis82 mapped pointsGoogle Places (70) + OpenStreetMap (12) capture, pinned 2026-09-08 (Tier B). Food 28 · retail 20 · transport admin 14 · services 8 · lounge 4 · admin 4 · other 3 · lodging 1. Zone attribution: C 24 · Main Terminal 17 · A 12 · B 5 · landside or periphery 24
In-building systemNone on recordReconciled DAS master, 2026-07-28: DAS no · self-owned no · neutral host no Imagine knowledge graph
Neutral-host solicitationRFP NET-11423, Neutral Host Distributed Antenna SystemReleased 2024-10-04; proposals due 2024-11-21, extended to 2024-12-09 after two addenda; ten-year term with a five-year renewal; wireless service provider (WSP) agnostic 5G; no capital outlay by CLE. No award appears in the record we hold; the Department holds the current status Imagine knowledge graph
Capital programCLEvolution, about $1.6BNew terminal 2032 · garage and ground transportation center 2029 · Gold Lot 2027. Per the Imagine knowledge graph
Public Wi-FiSSID CLE_Public_WiFiPer the Imagine knowledge graph; provider not named
Macro-site layerQueuedMacro-site geometry is queued for the next revision
Photo · Terminal complex from the air, October 2025Wikimedia Commons
Aerial photograph of the Cleveland Hopkins terminal complex in October 2025: the Main Terminal with Concourses A, B, and C extending from it, apron, parked aircraft, and parking structures

Photo: Kevin Payravi, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative (Tier B), resized only.

Fig. 1 · Venue map · aerodrome, OSM buildings, 49 gates, 25,152 RF tilesSource · Ookla
Map of the KCLE aerodrome outline with the OpenStreetMap terminal footprints for the Main Terminal and Concourses A, B, and C, the closed Concourse D dashed, 49 gate points, and the on-airport RF tile centroids as a light dot field

Aerodrome = OSM way 181471348 plus 200 m clip. 25,152 RF tiles resolve to 14,273 unique centroids. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics tiles on OpenStreetMap geometry. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Download the full report (PDF · rev 1)
Section 3

Carrier results

Ordered by gate median · strongest first

Carriers are ordered by descending gate median 5G RSRP throughout this report. Each gate value is the mean of tiles within 80 m of the gate point; the venue value is the median across the 49 gates. Every published gate-carrier pair has at least 30 tiles.

CarrierGate median 5GHealthy gates (5G)At riskBest 5G NRBest LTEMedian SINRGate median LTE
Verizon−86.1 dBm49 / 49034 / 4946 / 49+16.4 dB−87.5 dBm
T-Mobile−89.1 dBm49 / 49015 / 491 / 49+13.5 dB−97.4 dBm
AT&T−96.3 dBm10 / 49390 / 492 / 49+14.9 dB−96.8 dBm

Healthy = gate mean ≥ −95 dBm. SINR healthy (≥ 10 dB): Verizon 49, T-Mobile 49, AT&T 37 of 49 gates. LTE healthy gates: Verizon 45, AT&T 17, T-Mobile 6 of 49. Full per-gate tables ship in the PDF appendices.

Photo · Main Terminal check-in hall, October 2025Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of the Main Terminal check-in hall at the Southwest counters in October 2025, with kiosks, queue lanes, and overhead signage

Photo: Kevin Payravi, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative (Tier B), resized only.

Fig. 2 · Venue medians across 49 gates · 5G RSRPSource · Ookla
Bar chart of gate median 5G RSRP per carrier against the healthy, at-risk, and critical threshold lines, with n on every bar

Locked ladder: healthy ≥ −95 · at-risk −95 to −110 · critical < −110 dBm. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Fig. 3 · 5G NR RSRP by tile · terminal area · locked coverage classSource · Ookla
Three side-by-side tile maps of the terminal area for Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T, each tile colored healthy, at-risk, or critical by 5G RSRP, grey tiles with no 5G reading, terminal footprints and gate labels overlaid; AT&T shows the most grey and at-risk tiles along Concourse A and the Main Terminal

5G NR RSRP by tile, terminal area, locked coverage class; grey = no 5G reading. Reporting tiles: Verizon 1,693 of 2,288 · T-Mobile 2,309 of 2,652 · AT&T 816 of 1,938. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Fig. 4 · LTE RSRP by tile · terminal area · locked coverage classSource · Ookla
Three side-by-side tile maps of the terminal area for Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T, each tile colored by LTE RSRP coverage class with grey for no LTE reading; T-Mobile and AT&T show at-risk tiles along the concourses where Verizon shows healthy tiles

LTE RSRP by tile, terminal area, locked coverage class; grey = no LTE reading. Reporting tiles: Verizon 1,879 of 2,288 · T-Mobile 1,501 of 2,652 · AT&T 1,832 of 1,938. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Fig. 5 · SINR distribution per carrier at gate levelSource · Ookla
Distribution of per-gate 5G SINR for each carrier with the 10 dB healthy line

SINR healthy threshold ≥ 10 dB. AT&T's quality at the gates is healthy where it has a 5G reading; its gap is coverage, not quality. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Section 4

Results by zone

A · B · C · Main Terminal · tile basis

Concourses hold fewer than 30 gates each, so zone results use the tile basis: every tile is assigned to the nearest gate or tenant point with a zone label within 500 m. Healthy share is the share of a carrier's zone tiles at or above −95 dBm. The smallest published cell holds 133 tiles.

ZoneVerizon healthyVerizon medianT-Mobile healthyT-Mobile medianAT&T healthyAT&T medianBest 5G NR
(gate counts)
Concourse A91%n=869−84 dBm87%n=1,213−87 dBm46%n=416−97 dBmVerizon13 of 13
Concourse B91%n=308−87 dBm71%n=390−92 dBm43%n=136−97 dBmVerizon11 of 11
Concourse C76%n=1,510−88.5 dBm89%n=2,125−84 dBm65%n=488−91 dBmT-Mobile 15Verizon 10
Main Terminal86%n=178−87 dBm82%n=205−81 dBm42%n=133−101 dBmNo gatestiles only

Healthy share and median on the tile basis; n = tiles per carrier per zone. Best 5G NR counts are gate counts (fewer than 30 gates per concourse, reported as counts, never ranked).

Verizon holds the highest healthy share in A and B. T-Mobile holds the highest healthy share and the strongest median in C. The Main Terminal splits: T-Mobile holds the stronger median (−81 against −87 dBm) and Verizon the higher healthy share (86% against 82%). AT&T's healthy share stays below 70% in all four zones, its best zone is Concourse C at 65%, and its Main Terminal median is −101 dBm. Critical-band gates (< −110 dBm): zero, for every carrier.

Fig. 6 · Healthy 5G tile share by zone and carrierSource · Ookla
Grouped bar chart of the share of zone tiles with healthy 5G RSRP for each carrier, with minimum n per carrier on the axis
Fig. 7 · Median 5G RSRP by zone and carrierSource · Ookla
Grouped bar chart of per-zone median 5G RSRP per carrier on the tile basis against the healthy line
Fig. 8 · Coverage-class distribution by zone and carrierSource · Ookla
Stacked bar chart of healthy, at-risk, and critical tile shares by zone for each carrier

V = Verizon, T = T-Mobile, A = AT&T. Tile basis; n per zone on the axis. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Building-masked view
Fig. 9 · Building-masked view · 5G NR class for tiles inside the OSM footprintsSource · Ookla
Three tile maps showing only the tiles whose centroids fall inside the OpenStreetMap terminal footprints, colored by 5G RSRP coverage class, for Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T; AT&T's Concourse A and Main Terminal tiles are mostly at-risk or critical while Verizon's are mostly healthy

Tiles inside the pinned OSM building polygons: Verizon n=427 · T-Mobile n=431 · AT&T n=393. Building-polygon mask is ours; the Ookla Indoor layer is queued. Source: Ookla Cell Analytics on OpenStreetMap footprints. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Building (OSM polygon)Verizon healthy · medianT-Mobile healthy · medianAT&T healthy · median
Main Terminal77% · −92.0 dBmn=128 tiles82% · −83.0 dBmn=152 tiles27% · −105.5 dBmn=90 tiles
Concourse A98% · −86.0 dBmn=66 tiles66% · −93.0 dBmn=68 tiles9% · −105.0 dBmn=54 tiles
Concourse B98% · −87.0 dBmn=45 tiles85% · −90.0 dBmn=46 tiles42% · −97.0 dBmn=31 tiles
Concourse C68% · −91.0 dBmn=142 tiles83% · −90.0 dBmn=151 tiles43% · −97.0 dBmn=77 tiles

Healthy = tile 5G RSRP ≥ −95 dBm; median over tiles inside the polygon. n counts tiles, not scans.

This view is our building-polygon mask: tile centroids that fall inside the pinned OpenStreetMap footprints. It is not Ookla's Indoor layer, which is queued for the next revision. Inside the buildings AT&T is healthy on 27% of Main Terminal tiles and 9% of Concourse A tiles, against 77% to 98% for Verizon. The carrier ranking in section 3 does not change.

How to read a tile map

Each tile is 0.0001° by 0.0001°, about 8 m by 11 m, and is colored by the locked ladder from the tile's aggregated RSRP over the window. A tile with no reading had no 5G sample from the Android panel in the window. That means no measurement, not no coverage. Gate labels mark the pinned OSM gate points.

Section 5

Cross-carrier concordance

One-carrier-weak vs all-weak gates

This split decides what a neutral-host system would fix. A gate weak for all three carriers points to the building, its geometry, or propagation. A gate weak for exactly one carrier points to that carrier's path.

10
Gates healthy for all three carriers · all in Concourse C
39
Gates weak for exactly one carrier · AT&T at 39 of 39
0
Gates weak for two carriers
0
Gates weak for all three carriers

By concourse: A holds 13 one-carrier-weak gates, B holds 11, and C holds 10 all-healthy gates plus 15 one-carrier-weak gates. The tiles show no gate-wide propagation problem. The weakness is AT&T-specific. A neutral-host system would address it as a hosted AT&T path. The concordance does not by itself demonstrate a building problem.

Fig. 10 · Carriers below the healthy line per gate, by concourseSource · Ookla
Per-concourse count of gates by how many of the three carriers fall below the healthy line at that gate

Gate counts. Healthy = gate mean 5G RSRP ≥ −95 dBm. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Section 6

Concourse C and Main Terminal

25 C gates · densest zone
Concourse C

Concourse C is the largest zone (25 gates; United, American, JetBlue, Air Canada) and the one zone where the carrier order changes. T-Mobile holds best 5G NR at 15 of 25 gates and Verizon at 10. On the tile basis T-Mobile's median is −84 dBm against Verizon's −88.5 dBm, and T-Mobile is healthy on 89% of tiles against Verizon's 76%. AT&T's healthy share reaches 65% here, its highest of the four zones, and all 10 all-healthy gates in the venue sit in C.

Fig. 11 · Per-gate 5G RSRP · 25 Concourse C gatesSource · Ookla
Per-gate mean 5G RSRP bars for the 25 Concourse C gates across three carriers with the healthy line

Each bar is a mean over at least 30 tiles within 80 m of the gate. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Photo · Concourse C, United seating areaWikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of a United Airlines gate seating area in Concourse C with rows of seats, windows onto the apron, and overhead signage

Photo: Kevin Payravi, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative (Tier B), resized only.

Photo · Concourse C, gate C28Wikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of gate C28 in Concourse C showing the gate desk, flight information display, and waiting area

Photo: Kevin Payravi, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative (Tier B), resized only.

Main Terminal

The Main Terminal holds no gates, so it is read on tiles only. The two leading carriers split the zone: T-Mobile holds the stronger median (−81 dBm against Verizon's −87 dBm) and Verizon the higher healthy share (86% of tiles against 82%). AT&T is healthy on 42% of Main Terminal tiles with a median of −101 dBm, its weakest zone median and the one zone where its critical share rises. The zone carries the highest unique-device density in the venue (median 22 per tile, p95 66) and ranks first on the density-weighted weak share (section 10).

Concourses A and B

Verizon holds best 5G NR at all 24 A and B gates. AT&T is healthy on 46% of Concourse A tiles and 43% of Concourse B tiles, and the five largest carrier spreads in the venue sit at Concourse A gates (section 11).

Fig. 12 · Per-gate 5G RSRP · 24 Concourse A and B gatesSource · Ookla
Per-gate mean 5G RSRP bars for the 13 Concourse A and 11 Concourse B gates across three carriers with the healthy line

Frontier in A; Delta and Southwest in B (Tier B). Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Photo · Concourse moving sidewalkWikimedia Commons
Interior photograph of a concourse corridor with a moving sidewalk, glass railings, and overhead lighting

Photo: Cards84664, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative (Tier B), resized only.

Section 7

Terminal vs periphery proxy

Category proxy · tile basis

This proxy compares each carrier's median 5G RSRP over tiles near terminal-category points (retail, food, lounge, admin, services) with tiles near periphery-category points (transport admin, lodging, other). A large positive periphery-minus-terminal delta is the macro-spillover signature. A flat delta is ambiguous between a close-in macro site and an unrecorded in-building asset.

−2.0 dB
Verizon delta · terminal −87 (n=1,500) · periphery −89 (n=591) · flat
0.0 dB
T-Mobile delta · terminal −87 (n=2,003) · periphery −87 (n=776) · flat
+1.0 dB
AT&T delta · terminal −97 (n=750) · periphery −96 (n=298) · slightly periphery-stronger
Fig. 13 · Median 5G RSRP · terminal vs periphery tenant categoriesSource · Ookla
Per-carrier median 5G RSRP over terminal-category tiles beside periphery-category tiles, with n and the healthy line

Proxy: category-based masking on 82 mapped points (Google Places + OpenStreetMap, pinned 2026-09-08), not Ookla's building-polygon mask. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Photo · RTA Red Line station entrance, a periphery-category pointWikimedia Commons
Exterior photograph of the entrance to the Greater Cleveland RTA Red Line station at the airport, a transport-category point on the periphery side of the proxy

Photo: Jacob G., CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Illustrative (Tier B), resized only.

Section 8

Carrier attestation of coverage sources

Coverage-source attestation

The record we hold lists no in-building system at CLE, yet two carriers reach the gates with flat terminal-to-periphery deltas and healthy readings at 49 of 49 gates. The tile export cannot say what carries them.

Verizon (−2.0 dB) and T-Mobile (0.0 dB) show flat deltas. Each is consistent with a close-in macro grid reaching the terminal, and each is also consistent with an in-building asset that the reconciled DAS master does not record. AT&T's +1.0 dB delta is slightly periphery-stronger, consistent with but not proof of macro spillover; its 39 at-risk gates point the same way. This report converts the ambiguity into an attestation question: each carrier states the source of its terminal coverage before any DAS design freezes.

Attestation scope

Tile aggregates measure signal, not infrastructure. Macro-site geometry is queued for the next revision, so the close-in-macro reading is inference. The resolution is documentary (carrier attestation, as-builts if any exist), not more tiles. See recommendation 2.

Section 9

Spectrum and 5G footprint

Footprint · low-band reliance

The 5G footprint is the share of a carrier's on-airport tiles that report a 5G NR (New Radio) reading. T-Mobile 87% (7,749 of 8,892 tiles), Verizon 70% (6,158 of 8,840), AT&T 36% (2,663 of 7,420). The remaining 64% of AT&T's tiles carry LTE only, which is why its LTE median at the gates (−96.8 dBm) matters more than it does for the other two carriers.

Fig. 14 · 5G footprint · share of tiles with a 5G NR readingSource · Ookla
Bar chart of the share of each carrier's on-airport tiles that report a 5G NR reading, with tile counts

Footprint counts tiles with a non-null 5G reading. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Low-band reliance

The percent-low-band statistic is the share of a tile's LTE observations on sub-1 GHz bands. A carrier whose tiles lean on 600, 700, or 850 MHz spectrum is using coverage-grade bands where mid-band is not reaching the tile reliably. T-Mobile's distribution sits near zero; Verizon and AT&T carry a wider tail of low-band tiles.

Fig. 15 · LTE percent-low-band distribution per carrierSource · Ookla
Box plot of the share of LTE observations on sub-1 GHz bands per tile for each carrier, with tile counts

n = tiles reporting the field: Verizon 8,645 · T-Mobile 8,834 · AT&T 7,152. Macro-site geometry is queued for the next revision.

Section 10

Load, density, and Wi-Fi offload

Venue and zone level only

User_Density is Ookla's count of unique Android devices observed in a tile over the 12-month window, deduplicated. It is a device count over the window and nothing else. Zone medians and 95th percentiles (p95) locate where observed devices concentrate.

ZoneMedian devices
per tile
p95Usage
tiles (n)
AT&T below
healthy
Density-
weighted rank
Wi-Fi
offload
Main Terminal226622158%of tiles132%
Concourse A2181,92654%244%
Concourse C2153,59535%350%
Concourse B11579257%429%
Venue21714,065n/an/a46.0%

Density-weighted weak share = worst-carrier below-healthy tile share × median density. AT&T is the worst carrier in 4 of 4 zones. Offload = Σ Wi-Fi MB ÷ Σ (Wi-Fi + mobile) MB on the All Networks panel.

The Main Terminal ranks first: AT&T is below healthy on 58% of its tiles, and the zone's median density is eleven times the highest concourse median. Concourse A ranks second on a similar weak share and a far lower density.

Fig. 16 · Worst-carrier 5G class per tile and unique-device density per tileSource · Ookla
Two terminal-area maps side by side: on the left, each tile where all three carriers report is colored by the worst carrier's 5G coverage class, with at-risk tiles concentrated along Concourse A, Concourse B, and the Main Terminal; on the right, unique devices per usage tile on a log color scale, densest along the concourses and the Main Terminal

Left: worst-carrier 5G NR class per tile where all three carriers report (n=531). Right: User_Density per usage tile, unique devices over the window, deduplicated, log scale (n=3,715). Source: Ookla Cell Analytics. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Fig. 17 · Unique-device density by zone · density-weighted weak-share rankingSource · Ookla
Left: median and p95 unique devices per tile by zone. Right: horizontal bars ranking zones by worst-carrier weak share times median density

User_Density = unique devices over the window, deduplicated. Tile basis. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Wi-Fi offload

Venue-wide, 46.0% of observed data volume moves over Wi-Fi (n=14,065 usage tiles). Zone shares run from 29% in Concourse B to 50% in Concourse C. Wi-Fi is present on 53% of the 10,518 tiles that report the field.

Fig. 18 · Observed data volume by zone and bearerSource · Ookla
Grouped bars of observed mobile and Wi-Fi data volume in GB by zone over the 12-month window
Fig. 19 · Wi-Fi share of observed data volume by zoneSource · Ookla
Bar chart of the Wi-Fi share of observed data volume per zone with the 46.0% venue reference line
No per-carrier offload

Offload is computed at venue and zone level only. The export does not attribute Wi-Fi usage to any cellular carrier's subscribers, so per-carrier offload is not derivable at any aggregation and is never implied here. The figure blends CLE_Public_WiFi with tenant and personal networks and cannot separate them. Absence of a Wi-Fi reading on a tile is absence of measurement.

Section 11

Carrier-asymmetry atlas

Worst-carrier tally per gate

Per gate, the atlas names the weakest carrier and the spread from the strongest carrier's mean to the weakest. AT&T is the worst carrier at 47 of 49 ranked gates; Verizon at 2. All 49 gates clear the 30-tile floor for every carrier, so none are excluded. The five largest spreads sit at Concourse A gates and are the named compression targets in section 12.

GateConcourse · airline (Tier B)Worst carrierSpreadMin n per carrier
A6A · FrontierAT&T22.4 dB123
A5A · FrontierAT&T21.7 dB114
A3A · FrontierAT&T21.4 dB109
A4A · FrontierAT&T21.3 dB124
A8A · FrontierAT&T21.2 dB125
Fig. 20 · Carrier-asymmetry atlas · top 20 gates by spreadSource · Ookla
Horizontal bar chart of the 20 gates with the largest best-minus-worst carrier 5G RSRP spread; bar color marks the worst carrier, AT&T at every listed gate

Spread = best minus worst carrier mean 5G RSRP at the gate. Every published pair n ≥ 30 tiles. Window 2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31.

Section 12

Recommendations and acceptance criteria

Ordered by leverage · each with an owner
  1. Confirm the status of the 2024 neutral-host solicitation

    No award appears in the record we hold. If the procurement proceeds, adopt this baseline as the design input: the gate suite, the zone table, and the asymmetry atlas define what the system must change.

    Owner · Department of Port Control
  2. Have each carrier attest its terminal coverage source

    Verizon and T-Mobile show flat terminal-to-periphery deltas that the record cannot explain; AT&T is slightly periphery-stronger, consistent with but not proof of macro spillover. Obtain each carrier's statement before any DAS design freezes, so an unrecorded asset is not designed around or decommissioned unexamined.

    Owner · Department of Port Control + Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T
  3. Name the first acceptance zones

    AT&T in Concourses A and B (46% and 43% healthy tiles), Concourse C, and the Main Terminal (density-weighted rank 1). These zones carry the largest measured lift for a hosted AT&T path.

    Owner · Department of Port Control + neutral-host provider
  4. Re-measure over a like-for-like window after go-live

    Same instrument, same window length, same thresholds, for the before/after comparison. Use per-carrier commissioning walk tests, not the crowdsource panel, as the acceptance test.

    Owner · Imagine Wireless (re-measure) + neutral-host provider (walk tests)
  5. Obtain Wi-Fi controller telemetry to size the offload layer

    Venue offload is 46.0% of observed volume and reaches 50% in Concourse C. The tile export cannot separate CLE_Public_WiFi from tenant and personal networks; the controller can.

    Owner · Department of Port Control IT
  6. Decide the CBRS and private-wireless question alongside the DAS build

    Decide it with the neutral-host design and the CLEvolution program, since retrofitting Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) or operational spectrum into a commissioned system costs more than designing it in.

    Owner · Department of Port Control
Acceptance criteria
CriterionBaseline (rev 1)Target
AT&T healthy share, per zone10 of 49 gates healthy · tiles: A 46%, B 43%, C 65%, Main Terminal 42%Healthy at 90% or more of gates and tiles in each zone
Asymmetry spread at the named gatesA6 22.4 dB · A5 21.7 · A3 21.4 · A4 21.3 · A8 21.2Compressed to 10 dB or less at each named gate
T-Mobile LTE in Concourses A and BVenue LTE gate median −97.4 dBm · healthy at 6 of 49 gatesZone LTE medians in A and B raised to the −95 dBm healthy line

Gate-named criteria depend on the gate inventory; reconcile the OSM inventory (A 13, B 11, C 25) against the airport's current gate plan before adoption.

Section 13

Methodology and audit trail

Thresholds · provenance · reproducibility
RuleValue
Sample basisOokla Cell Analytics: crowdsourced background scans from consumer Android handsets, aggregated per tile over the 12-month window. Per-carrier RF exports plus one All Networks usage export.
Tile geometry0.0001° × 0.0001° tiles, about 8 m by 11 m at CLE's latitude. The export holds no per-tile scan count, so every n counts tiles, not scans. No Z-axis.
Signal ladder (locked)Healthy ≥ −95 dBm · at-risk −95 to −110 dBm · critical < −110 dBm. SINR healthy ≥ 10 dB.
JoinsGate and tenant values: mean of tiles within 80 m of the point. Zone assignment: nearest labeled point within 500 m. Clip: KCLE aerodrome polygon plus 200 m.
MapsTile maps color each 0.0001° tile by the locked ladder. Building mask = point-in-polygon of tile centroids against the pinned OSM footprints; a disclosed proxy for the Ookla Indoor layer, which is queued.
Minimum nNo chart or comparative claim ships on fewer than 30 tiles or points; smaller cells are reported as counts with n visible, never ranked. Margins under 1 dB are ties.
Metric disciplineSignal-layer only: no throughput, latency, or session counts are in this export and none are claimed. User_Density is a deduplicated unique-device count over the window. Per-carrier Wi-Fi offload is not derivable and never implied.
Window and freshness2025-08-01 to 2026-07-31 · issued 2026-09-08 · 39 days at issue, within the 90-day policy.
SourcingMeasured facts reproduce from raw exports; transcribed facts carry capture dates; facts sourced from the Imagine knowledge graph are tagged inline as such.
PhotographsTier B illustrative material from Wikimedia Commons under the listed licenses (CC BY-SA 4.0, resized only); credited on each image. Photographs are not measurements.
Tenant basis82 mapped venue points: 70 Google Places + 12 OpenStreetMap, pinned 2026-09-08 (Tier B). Lounge points with carrier data: 2 (The Club CLE, United Club).
Queued layersMacro-site geometry · Ookla building-polygon mask.
Audit trail

Every published measurement is independently recomputed from the raw pinned exports by validate_cle_report.py: 39 checks PASS, 19 of 19 Tier-A claims covered. The audit dossier (23-claim lane-tagged ledger, methodology, provenance manifest, findings log, agent-trace index) ships with the verification bundle. A blind cold read by an independent reviewer was completed on 2026-09-08 and its dispositions are applied in this issue. reproduce.sh run twice: byte-identical CHECKSUMS.sha256. Deliverable subject to the two-lane human review gate; sign-off status accompanies this issue.

Download the full report (PDF · rev 1)
Imagine Wireless · Venue Network Intelligence
Cleveland Hopkins International · rev 1 · 2026-09-08
Powered by Ookla Cell Analytics
Confidential · prepared for Department of Port Control stakeholder review